Both federal and provincial governments currently offer grants for condos that reduce their energy consumption by doing retrofits or adding measures such as solar power. Cities may also have their own incentive programs.
Energy savings measures are beneficial to the environment and are also good business because a great deal of money can be saved.
What kinds of retrofits are worth it? Measures that save a lot of energy and, thus, have a short pay-back period. “Short” generally means less than 8 years, and, usually, pay-back occurs within 2 to 3 years. That is, the monies spent on the retrofit will have been recovered in 2 to 3 years.

CFLs currently contain a bit more mercury than conventional bulbs and should be safely handled when they break. Pregnant and breast-feeding women as well as small children should not handle them. They are otherwise safe.
Very shortly, probably within 6 years, it is expected that LEDs, or light-emission diode bulbs, will replace CFLs, because these bulbs burn much less energy than CFLs and last even longer. Currently, LEDs do not produce sufficient light for an entire room and are still very expensive.
The double message conveyed in these notices should be: Energy conservation is good for the environment and saves money. (People are receptive to this message...)

As well, this can’t be done if, without pressurization, the end result is that no air is flowing in naturally from these vents themselves and other areas.
One easy way of testing for natural air flow when forced air is shut down is to put a hand around a suite’s door; if air is flowing naturally, one can feel it.
If this initiative is feasible, it can save several thousand dollars each month both in electricity in all seasons and gas in winter--depending on the size of the building and the number of forced air units, as well as the condition of the motors.
But, in winter, when there is a spell of extremely cold nights, especially on windy days, it is preferable to let fans work so that the frigid weather does not stall motors when they restart in the morning. In other words, managers have to be vigilant and follow weather forecasts.
Individual meters generally result in a 10 to 20% reduction in electricity consumed by residents in their suites: Residents become responsible for their consumption and no longer leave lights or the TV on when they leave. They use ovens, dishwashers, and laundry equipment more wisely.
Usually, electricity consumed in suites for all appliances and lights constitutes about 25 to 33% of the electricity used in the building. Therefore, smart individual meters save 25 to 33% of the costs of electricity for the corporation's budget.
After smart meters are installed, owners’ fees are readjusted downwardly on a pro-rated basis. This readjustment may take place over a period of two years.


The cover can be rolled manually (not difficult and less expensive) or it can be automated (more expensive).
But such a system also carries disadvantages, mainly in terms of initial price and costs associated with training managers or superintendents. In residential condos, these automated systems are often underutilized by managers, especially when there is a high turnover rate. As a result, the savings that could be obtained are not forthcoming.
These systems cost anywhere from $80,000 and upward—substantial sums, especially when they are not properly used afterwards. They can be expensive to maintain and particularly to upgrade later on. As well, some condos keep upgrading their system, each time requiring training for managers and, often, these upgrades are not used.
